![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home |
Mold, Moisture, and Your Home
Stachybotrys produces a mycotoxin that causes animal and human mycotoxicosis. This type of mold is thought to be a possible cause of the “sick building syndrome”. In May 1997, the Journal of the American Medical Association carried a news article titled “Floods carry potential for toxic mold disease”. Children’s exposure to air-borne Stachybotrys spores is thought most likely to cause pulmonary hemosiderosis (bleeding in the lungs). Please be aware that there is no threshold dangerous spore exposure level by the U.S. EPA or any other health administrations. There are ongoing new epidemiology studies being conducted. There is reference information related to a 1994 incident in Cleveland, Ohio where 45 cases of pulmonary hemorrhage in young infants occurred. Sixteen of the infants died. In addition, many state’s department of health administrations as well as the Center for Disease Control (CDC) list the following as symptoms associated with exposure to Stachybotrys mold spores:
PREVAILING CONDITIONS NECESSARY FOR THE GROWTH OF STACHYBOTRYS BLACK MOLD
![]()
![]() VISUAL DETECTION AND HOMEOWNER DISCLOSURES 1) The Stachybotrys fungi cannot be identified by a routine visual inspection. Remember all black mold is not necessarily Stachybotrys. It could be non-toxic black mold. The only method to determine the type of mold present is by sample analysis by an accredited laboratory. Also, it is important to keep in mind that the mold is only a toxic risk or hazard if a person breathes or comes into contact with the spores. Wet mold is not an indoor air quality health risk, but there is a significant potential for the mold to dry and released into the air. 2) There may be visual appearance of black mold in a visible water damage area, but be aware that there may be areas of water damage and mold that can be hidden (behind dry wall, under organic thread carpets). 3) The home inspector may notice or note water damage areas, but the majority of home inspectors are not aware of the water-damage environment and toxic mold relationship or concern. 4) Perhaps a question should be added on the homeowner disclosure which related to any water damage, water leaks, or flooding in the house or around the structure 5) Historical records of flooding in that geographic area may be used. 6) The standard ERC inspection form should perhaps contain an addendum, which would note any evidence of water, mold or mildew in or around the structure.
RECOMMENDED RELOCATION AND REAL ESTATE INDUSTRY RESPONSES AND CONSIDERATIONS 1. Require a disclosure question as to owner awareness of any water damage occurring while living in the house. This would include flooding from weather conditions, plumbing leaks, water intrainment from walls and floors, and fires. One might also ask the current owner if any insurance claims had been submitted. The date of occurrence and location of the water exposure and damage should also be included in the disclosure information. 2. If visible water damage is cited by home inspector or disclosed by the seller, then a confirmation Stachybotrys sampling determination should occur. This would show proper due diligence. Be aware that the home inspector or other real estate inspectors can not be responsible for hidden or unknown water damage or presence of black mold. Especially in areas behind drywalls or above thermal insulation. A professional industrial hygienist or indoor air quality professional with mold sampling experience and an accredited laboratory should be utilized for this inspection. 3. A moisture test of suspected water exposed or damaged walls could be performed in determining the conductive conditions for Stachybotry mold (similar to termite inspections). There may some potential connection with water-damage and stucco properties. 4. If the suspect Stachybotrys material (SSM) is confirmed as Stachybotrys mold, then the effected material should be removed. Professional persons using proper protection equipment (respirator, gloves, cleaning agents should perform this). Considerations for repair and replacement of materials should be made. If an abatement company is selected, the abatement will be very similar to a full-scale asbestos removal project with EPA AHERA adherence to negative pressure containment with HEPA filters, a high level of personnel protection, absence of all occupants doing the abatement and until air clearance tests are performed. The concern is that improper or inept Stachybotrys abatement could result in the spread of spore contamination throughout the house or building. Under no circumstances should the homeowner attempt a Stachybotrys abatement. 5. Very small areas of mold (less than 2 square feet) may be cleaned by the homeowner with a dust mask, rubber gloves and a bleach solution. Taking into account also that the cause of the water damage can be eliminated. 6. If contaminated materials are removed, it is absolutely necessary to correct the water exposure problem or possibly use a non-cellulose and low nitrogen replacement building materials. Even under the best of circumstances, there is an excellent chance for reoccurrence. 7. There is some question as to whether the Homeowners’ insurance will cover the damage and repair of Stachybotrys contaminated house structure components and contents. The “48 Hours” CBS TV show on the Stachybotrys toxic mold, indicated that the lady in Texas was suing her insurance company for recovery costs to her $2,000,000 plus home and contents.
PREVENTION OF MOLD IN DWELLINGS 1. As part of routine building maintenance, buildings should be inspected for evidence of water damage and visible mold. Conditions causing mold (such as water leaks, condensation, infiltration, or flooding) should be corrected. In addition, reducing the humidity by the addition of dehumidifier in a room could prevent the growth of the Stachybotrys mold. 2. Wash down any effected water areas with bleach-water mixture (1 cup of bleach to 1 gallon of water ratio), to assist in preventing mold growth.
RECAP AND FINAL CONCLUSIONS In final conclusion, the key concern is intent of discovery through due diligence by homeowner disclosure documentation and any available water damage/flood history in the area. This information may be obtained from the real estate appraisers, available area newspapers archives or from FEMA. The home inspector can only verify by visual inspection an apparent water damage or mold condition that visible and readily accessible at the time of the inspection. In most cases, home inspectors would not and could not comment on the presence of Stachybotrys mold. Once the conductive conditions are present and documented, an accredited lab should perform confirmation sampling. The question of proper response and policy is dependent on the extent of mold area, abatement, cost, and effect on the property value. Remember, that this environmental concern is similar to asbestos, except for short-term health response and undefined and growing liability. Under no circumstances should the homeowner be encouraged to abate a confirmed Stachybotrys contaminated wall. The state of New York Department of Health recommends that the homeowner might clean a small Stachybotrys effected area (less than 2 square feet) with proper gloves and low level respiratory protection with a bleach water solution. A very strong “paper trail” should be generated when Stachybotrys becomes an issue.
Click here for other mold types |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||